THE PRICE IS WRONG

How the gun industry fixes prices, but fails on safety
ORIGINAL REPORT | July 6, 2026
READ ON ↓

ANALYSIS

An analysis of gun industry economic data, court records, earnings call transcripts, and publicly available retailer agreements revealed that the gun industry uses a practice that resembles resale price maintenance (RPM) to enforce a price floor for guns in America. This is also known as price fixing.

Retailers used their market power to strong arm manufacturers into artificially inflating gun prices. This business practice exploits consumers, reduces market competition that could lead to safety innovations, and disproves the gun industry’s public claims that it has no ability to track supply chains to curb crime guns.

Continue reading for an overview of findings, or access the full report and supporting materials below.
DOWNLOAD REPORT ↓

FAST FACTS

  • Resale price maintenance is widely used in the gun industry, setting a price floor for firearms
  • Manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and trade associations share information and resources to enforce price floors.  
  • Independent retailers believe they operate on a level playing field with big box retailers, but, in fact, they are disproportionately impacted by enforcement that funnels economic benefits to bigger competitors on an unequal and disproportional basis.
  • Gun manufacturers claim they lack the tools to prevent the diversion of firearms to illegal markets, while boasting to investors about their total visibility into retail inventory and absolute price discipline. 

“...it's fun to sell because you don't have to worry about price.” 

Michael Fifer

Sturm Ruger CEO,
Q4 2013 Earnings Call

HOW RPM WORKS IN PRACTICE

  • Uniform Distributor-Retailer Price Policies (UDRPs) or Minimum Transfer Prices (MTPs): A pricing policy at the distributor level that sets the price at which distributors can sell merchandise to retailers.
  • Minimum Advertised Price Policies (MAPs): In theory, a restriction that prevents retailers from advertising prices lower than those set by manufacturers. In practice, the de facto resale price of guns in America. 

IN THEIR WORDS

Gun industry executives have publicly described their pricing practices in earnings calls, interviews, and affidavits.
While Smith & Wesson never bothered to check on whether gun dealers were selling its guns legally, he said, the company was more than willing to get tough with dealers who tried to sell guns at too low a price. "God knows we did that enough," he said.

Robert Haas

Former VP, Smith & Wesson
Deposition in Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
MAP is "that minimum that they're [manufactuers] asking you to sell it for."

Brandon Roper

Vice President, National Association of Sporting Goods Wholesalers (NASGW)
October 2025 NASGW webinar
" Whenever we had a price adjustment, we make them whole…So again, we expect a lot from our distributors, but in turn, they've come to expect a lot from Ruger. So it's really a 2-way street.”

Michael Fifer

CEO, Sturm Ruger
Q2 2022 Sturm Ruger & Company Inc Earnings Call
DOWNLOAD REPORT ↓

Resources

Get our full analysis, data, and artifacts used to inform the findings.

Gun Industry Cohesion, Market Power, and Retail Pricing

Access Guns Down America's full analysis of the gun industry's resale price maintenance practice.
DOWNLOAD NOW

Manufacturer Influence Report

Understand how the gun industry uses retail sales controls for their own bottom line, but not to protect communities from gun violence.
DOWNLOAD NOW

Hamilton v. Accu-Tek Case Files

Hamilton v. Accu-Tek (1999-2001) focuses on the gun industry's lack of care in preventing negligent distribution of weapons.
DOWNLOAD NOW

Haas Affidavit

Read the full affidavit from Robert Haas, former VP at Smith & Wesson, in Hamilton v. Accu-Tek describing practices that show the gun industry's oversight of pricing and blind-eye in curbing crime guns.
DOWNLOAD NOW

NAACP v. America Arms and NAACP v. AcuSport Corp

Access the case files for NAACP's 1999 suits against firearms manufacturers under public nuisance for negligent distribution practices. While the case was dismissed on the technicality of the NAACP as the plaintiff, the 176-page decision validates the case files and grounds.

This lawsuit led to the gun industry lobbying for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) which effectively gave them a federal shield against liability claims when it passed in 2005.
DOWNLOAD NOW

Support This Work

If you want to support oversight of the gun industry and drive greater accountability for leaders, make a donation to Guns Down America today. We're the only nonprofit focused solely on the intersection of economic justice, corporate accountability & gun violence prevention.
MAKE A DONATION